Hablamos Español
Protecting people's rights,
that's what I'm all about
Free Case Evaluation
(713) 589-8855
Phones Answered 24/7
Why Hire Me

Experienced and Aggressive Representation

Read More >
Office Location

Law Office of Justin T. Surginer
8831 Long Point Rd Ste 401
Houston, TX 77055

(713) 589-8855

view directions >

Difference Between State Crimes vs. Federal Crimes

Posted by Law Office of Justin T. Surginer

Is the United States becoming an over-criminalized nation? In late 2013, members of the United States House Judiciary Committee’s Task Force on Over-Criminalization were busy deliberating this topic before in Congress. The growing, combined body of criminal laws in the federal and state systems is a major concern among lawmakers who believe that the U.S. could one day become a giant penal colony.

Why is the U.S. criminal system growing out of control and eating up so much of the nation’s budget? Some legal analysts believe that mobility is blurring the lines between federal and state criminal offenses. In essence, federal crimes are those actions that violate the U.S. Code, which is passed by Congress. State crimes are violations of statutes passed by state legislatures. Furthermore, some counties and municipalities may enact ordinances that cover criminal behavior.

Federal and State Law Enforcement Agencies

Federal agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), the Border Patrol and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are tasked with enforcing criminal provisions of the U.S. Code and combating crime at a national level. States are generally free to police their jurisdictions and bring suspects to justice. However, state law enforcement agencies cannot get in the way of federal agencies.

In a small state such as Rhode Island, for example, a marijuana trafficking arrest made by the Providence Police Department could result in state charges being filed by the District Court Unit of Providence County. Likewise, a team of DEA agents investigating marijuana smuggling in Cranston can make an arrest and refer the case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Rhode Island for federal charges.

Question of Jurisdiction

When criminal defendants evaluate defense attorneys, the topic of jurisdiction and where the lawyer has been admitted to practice is bound to be discussed. The federal and state rules of procedure can be quite different, and courtroom trials and sentencing determinations will also present great variance.

Another difference between federal and state cases is the former is more likely to use grand jury investigations than the latter. Whereas state law enforcement agencies are more likely to conduct their own investigations and move to arrest suspects, U.S. attorneys are more likely to evaluate complaints before federal grand juries and conduct investigations in this manner.

In the state system, criminal defendants are more likely to be able to defend their cases before their respective supreme courts than in the federal system. State cases that pose significant Constitutional issues may sometimes be referred to federal courts.

Request a Call
 I have read the
Case Results
  • DWI - Harris County
    Young man seen leaving nightclub by a police officer. Client takes and fails field sobriety tests and breathalyzer test.
    Not guilty
  • Possession of Marijuana- Harris County
    Client set for trial on two possession of marijuana cases. Client admits to owning all marijuana in the vehicle on video. Motion to suppress granted.
    Cases dismissed
  • DWI - Harris County
    Client found passed out behind the wheel of a car by police officer after crashing into a light post.
    Case dismissed
  • Solicitation of Prostitution - Matagorda County
    Prison guard arrested for soliciting an undercover police officer. All was captured on audio recording.
    Jury trial, not guilty
More Results >
Recent Blog Posts